Engine troubles - GM's steps to bankruptcy


GM stood atop the Fortune 500 nine years ago; it now stands on the brink of bankruptcy court as sales decline and cash becomes scarce.
On Wednesday, GM announced that its unsecured bondholders had rejected the company's offer for a debt-for-stock exchange, so even though the United Auto Workers struck a deal with management last Thursday, bankruptcy still looms as the probable course.

How did such a once great company become so desperate? Perhaps the better question is, how did GM's well-paid management fritter away a treasure chest of brand loyalty and corporate wealth? There's not a single bad decision or one misguided executive that we can point to and say, "but for that GM would still rein supreme." GM's is a long-term management failure with a litany of losing moves over the decades, from the Chevy Corvair to the acquisition of Hummer — a rolling insult to the environment — that have collectively destroyed GM's balance sheet and sent its customers wandering.

GM didn't just under-serve customers; it over-served its workforce, lavishing lush pay, perks and future benefits on its management and employees even as its franchise began to fray. No doubt, the recent economic turmoil has exacerbated GM's descent. But long before the subprime mortgage crisis or the recession GM had failings — in leadership, in design, in strategy, and in the self discipline required to keep labor contracts affordable.

Will the government save GM?

Comments

curiouslilboy said…
interesting...of course GM had failings — in leadership, in design, in strategy
Neel said…
The write up on GM is really very interesting....and to see the pioneers of the Auto industry falling like a house of cards is really very hard to digest.....but if one was actually following the trends of the auto industry,then probably he would have seen it coming.....GM was in deep slumber...they didnt work on new innovative techniques vis a vis fuel effecient cars,their sole concern was to satiate the demands of the fuel guzzling American society...while Ford on the other hand had already marketed its fuel efficent cars in Europe,GM was still not ready for it......
by 1st of june the fate of GM will become a lot clearer...the Federal Govt wants 70%stake in the company...their German counterparts want to see that the European branch of the company gets somehow saved form this bloody nose,with clever tactical maneuvering.....and the short sightedness of the Corporate board members and its Executives were evident when they chose to fly in their own corporate jets,while coming to meet the Govt officials with a begging bowl....Hence the writing was very much in the wall......Great Sarika...it was really fascinating to read this topic....keep up the good work....
divineGirl said…
thanks :) and yes.. what you reported was also mentioned by many others... I digged into the problem - this blog template is a non standard one, and hence was buggy, so I just corrected the code.. n voila! its working-thx 2 ur beta testing!
divineGirl said…
and ofcourse, to remain in business, one gotta be innovative!
Jayesh Badani said…
When I was at GMAC for an IT assignment, I kept on feeling the overhead these organizations have, and convinced myself that may be I am missing something. When one has a consultant to manage their consultants. When one awards the project to change the process they follow every year and then award additional projects to migrate from previous process to new process - all these is done when the end results the IT system is not giving them what they want. In short process overload!

http://collaboratetoinnovate.blogspot.com/